Friday, August 30, 2013

Message to "Ride of the Century" Motorcyclists

During the weekend of August 30 to September 1, 2013, up to 3,000 motorcycles will congest various areas within the St. Louis region for a gathering and group ride called the “Ride of the Century 2013”.  In previous years, this event included thousands of local and out-of-state participants – many using modified “sport” or “stunt” bikes to perform dangerous stunts on public roadways, block traffic and taunt law enforcement.

In a blatant disregard for their safety and the safety of others, motorcyclists commonly perform stunts in the middle of both vehicular and pedestrian traffic, creating hazardous driving conditions and often causing accidents. It is common for riders to block highways as well as travel the wrong way on roadways and ride through grassy medians to evade law enforcement. During the 2012 event, group participants blocked I-70 in the downtown area in order to perform various stunts, unlawfully hindering interstate traffic.

Throughout the Labor Day weekend, law enforcement expects an increase in calls for service and on-view incidents connected to this event, as participants travel throughout the area. Motorcycles without proper registration and/or insurance, or motorcycles involved in the commission of other vehicle related violations will require the arrest of the operator as well as the towing of the motorcycle.

In an effort to combat this reckless and dangerous behavior, officers from St. Louis City, St. Louis County and troopers from the Missouri State Highway Patrol will work together along with the Missouri Department of Transportation in a coordinated approach to keep riders and the motoring public safe.

Bottom-line, the St. Louis region is a great place to live. It welcomes groups of all types to enjoy all the city has to offer in a responsible and safe way without putting others at risk.

The message to motorcyclists visiting St. Louis this weekend: welcome, but obey the laws of the road.

Thursday, August 22, 2013

Organizing for Action: Gun Violence Prevention Rally: My Remarks

It would be the easiest thing in the world for me to keep silent on this issue, but it wouldn’t be the right thing. As a police chief, nothing requires me to make public comments about controversial issues like gun control. Nothing except my conscience; which in this case, tells me that the message is far more important than any risk of political fallout or backlash.

Let me make one thing very clear from the beginning: just like most Americans, most Missourians, and most St. Louisans, I support the 2nd Amendment. I believe responsible citizens have a right to reasonable gun ownership for hunting, sporting and legitimate self-defense. I’ve always believed that.

But let me tell you something else I believe: we must be very careful when it comes to defining who is responsible and what is reasonable. And over the past 10 years or so, when it comes to guns and gun violence, I’m afraid we as a nation have been drifting away from both responsibility and reason.

Let me use an analogy to explain exactly what I mean. We all believe that people should have the right to go where they please, to travel freely from place to place, right? But that doesn’t mean we let just anyone operate a 2,000 pound vehicle without first proving they can do so responsibly by obtaining a driver’s license, an equipment safety inspection, insurance, etc. It also doesn’t mean we let people drive on city streets in 200mph race cars or armored military vehicles that bear no relationship to their legitimate travel needs.

Well, what I believe about guns is not too different from what I believe about cars: people have a right to buy them and use them, but because both cars and guns have the potential to be dangerous, both rights should be subject to some minimal conditions. We expect people to reach a certain age before they drive, we expect them to pass a test and we expect them to submit proof of identity. If they have a condition which prevents them from driving safely, we don't let them drive. And even the best drivers aren't allowed to run around in Formula 1 race cars or Abrams tanks.

All I ask with respect to guns is that we start treating them with half as much caution as we treat cars. If people want to own a gun, they should be required to submit proof of identity and pass a basic background check. If people have a condition - such as a serious mental illness or a history of violence - which prevents them from using guns safely, we should not let them buy one. And because there is no reasonable use or need for such things, people should not be allowed to own extreme, military-grade armaments.

Simply put: I want to see a decent minimum level of precaution about who gains access to guns, along with a modest limit on the intensity of the firepower available. And by the way…here too, I find myself in agreement with most Americans, most Missourians, and most St. Louisans. Poll after poll has shown that background checks are a common sense policy supported by the vast majority of American, 90% in fact, all across the political spectrum.

Consider this amazing fact: Between 1982 and 2012, there were 62 mass shootings in the United States. 49 of them involved legally acquired weapons. Now think about how many of those attacks were committed by people with a prior history of mental illness, people who recently discussed attack plans or made threats, or engaged in a variety of other "red flag" behaviors. Think about how many lives we might have saved, just by preventing those. Think about what we owe to the people we failed to protect. Think about what we must do for those in the future who expect our protection, and deserve to get it.

Looking back at the history of gun violence, looking back at major incidents like ABB, Tucson, Aurora, Newton, looking at the school shooting in Georgia just this week, how can it be controversial to say: “We as a society should have done better. We as a society must do better now?”

Shouldn’t it be the other way around? Shouldn’t it be controversial to look at the current, unacceptable state of affairs and…simply accept it?

Well I don’t accept it, and for me this isn't just a professional opinion, it's also a personal stand. I’ve seen too much since becoming a police officer. I think about all the homicides and the suicides a cop sees, most of them made possible by guns. I think about all the aggravated assaults – more than 8,000 with firearms in this city during the past five years. I also think about the close calls and the near-misses which don't always make the paper. I think about the man who attacked two of our officers with an AK-47. I think about the 15-year old who used a handgun to commit a carjacking last month. I think about more horror stories than anyone should have to know, and more than I have time to tell on this page.

What we want isn’t controversial. What we want is just common sense. Even if we do nothing more than improve the background check process, we can all keep our rights and increase our safety. We don’t have to choose between one and the other, and we don't have to accept the status quo.

We can do better.

                              Organizing for Action: Gun Violence Prevention Rally, August 22, 2013

Saturday, August 3, 2013

TRI-ARC Award: What It Means To Me

Today, the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department reached an important milestone in its long history of growth and organizational development, and I am very proud to be a part of it. We received an honor shared by only 10 other law enforcement agencies in the world* – the CALEA “TRI-ARC” Award.

Let me explain what this means, and why it’s important.
Many professions rely on accreditation systems to help them assure quality and establish industry-wide best practices. Schools and colleges seek accreditation, so do hospitals, engineering firms and information technology providers, to name just a few among many.

Law enforcement is no exception. Like other cutting-edge professions, we use the accreditation process to help us grow and develop, so we can provide better service to our clients: the citizens. The best source of guidance and the highest set of standards in the world are provided by the Commission on the Accreditation of Law Enforcement Agencies, otherwise known as CALEA.

CALEA offers three separate and distinct types of accreditation.  One is for law enforcement agencies, another is for public safety training academies and a third is for public safety communications.

The first step for us was completed 2007, when we received our law enforcement agency accreditation, and again when we were re-accredited in 2010.  In 2012 we went further, and our police academy earned its public safety training accreditation.  Now, in 2013, we have completed the third and final element as our 911 call and dispatch division becomes an accredited public safety communications center. 

Only agencies that earn and maintain all three types of accreditation get the honor of being TRI-ARC winners. Our membership in that club becomes official today.

This is a big deal.  It means our citizens can be confident that we are following the best standards and practices available in the law enforcement industry.  It means we have faced and will continue to face the kind of rigorous, independent assessment of policies and practices that comes with accreditation.  It means we are committed to a process of ongoing improvements, professional evolution and organizational development.  It means we are in the business of saying what we mean and meaning what we say.

For us that meaning is reflected in visible symbols like TRI-ARC award and the CALEA emblems that decorate our police cars. 

I hope citizens can see the same meaning in the service we provide, and the work we do on a daily basis.
Congratulations SLMPD. I’m proud of you, achieving and maintaining this status is no easy task.

* I’m also proud to note that one of the other 10 TRI-ARC award-winning agencies is the St. Louis County Police Department. Hat tip to my friends, Chief Tim Fitch and retired Chief Jerry Lee. You beat us to the finish line by a couple years, but it's really the St. Louis region that wins.